World Polyamory Association  
POLYAMORY: MORE LOVES, more loving

HomeAboutCommunityCONFERENCESCounselingEventsNewsletter

POLYAMORY & POLY-RELATED NEWS

Home
Advice
Advertise
Art
Articles
Books
Conferences
Contact Us
Dating
Directory
Education
Events
Faculty
FAQ
Forum
Groups
Links
Media
Memberships
Photos
Poly News
News Groups
Personals
Presentations
Presenters
Promote
Profiles
Scholarships
Store
Testimonials
Volunteer
Workshops

 Check out our Frappr!
 



 



 



 



 


 

 

Three's Company
By Liz Langley, AlterNet. Posted April 14, 2006.

 
 

http://www.alternet.org/story/34934/

 
What the heck is polyamory, and is it a legitimate way to sustain a romantic relationship? Tools
email EMAIL
print PRINT
106 COMMENTS
 

Also in Top Stories

Permission to Speak Freely, Sir
Stephen Pizzo, News for Real

Now He Tells Us
Robert Scheer, AlterNet

Bush's Final Jeopardy
Elizabeth de la Vega, Tomdispatch.com

The Poor Man's Air Force
Mike Davis, Tomdispatch.com

Again With the 'Jewish Conspiracy'
Evan Derkacz, AlterNet

The Down Side of Slashdot
Annalee Newitz, AlterNet

Two Years in Jail for a Joint?
Anthony Papa, AlterNet

Gingrich Criticizes Bush, Aids Enemy
Glenn Greenwald, AlterNet

Toward a Real Immigration Debate
Joshua Holland, AlterNet

Ain't Just Whistling Dixie
Stan Cox, AlterNet


More stories by Liz Langley
 

 

Polyamory is more than just an excellent drag name. It's the state of being openly in love with more than one person, or having more than one love relationship simultaneously. Kind of like polygamy without the marriage part.

Thanks to HBO's new series "Big Love," which features a Utah polygamist with three wives, romantic multitasking is getting viewed with a fresh new eye. Honestly, I think a lot of people are in polyamorous relationships. It's just that one member of the group doesn't know about it yet -- they're called "affairs."

I mentioned this theory to Janet Kira Lessin, president and CEO of the World Polyamory Association, and she thinks it's just about right. "Our society suffers from pluralistic ignorance. We're doing one thing while professing another," she says."Polyamory is just another offshoot of people who are sick and tired of having to lie."

Janet and her husband, Sasha, a psychotherapist, both do relationship and polyamory counseling and teach tantra in Maui. Married since 1997, Janet says, "[Sasha] and I are primaries," meaning they have priority among whoever else they bring into the relationship. "We dated this other couple for four years and that was just incredible," she says. The other pair had to leave Maui for reasons not related to the relationship. "It was like breaking up," Janet says, a little wistful at the thought. But life goes on. "We have another single fellow that we're starting to date right now."

I've never tried polyamory myself, but have always been curious about it for lots of reasons. Maybe it's because I'm an American, and I think more is better. Second, I've far too often been plagued by this quandary: Do I date the one who is safe, comfortable and good? Or the one who's so hot my jeans catch fire? Polyamory seems like it would eliminate that conundrum.

I'm not entirely joking. Are people really like dinner courses at Joan Crawford's house: You can't have the next one until you're totally finished with the first?

"People in monogamous relationships are sometimes afraid to share their thoughts," Janet says. Been there. But if we tried, would the world really end? Or could we come to terms with other attractions and affections so they woudn't have to mean the end of a good thing, the foregoing of an also-good thing or a potential deception?

Never having tried polyamory, I don't know if I could handle it or not. "You [need] to have a willingness to look at jealousy and see what it really is," says Janet, who was in two traditional marriages (the first ended in abuse) before trying polyamory in 1991. "Are you feeling envy? Are you feeling abandoned? What is jealousy for you?"

"Yes, I have experienced being jealous in this lifestyle," she says, but she has a community where she can talk about it. Another thing about polyamory is that typical relationship processes are accelerated. "If you have baggage, you're going to have it shown to you by more than one person," she says. You "get busted on your shit" more quickly.

I admire Janet's guts for trying it. At the moment, for me to worry about handling multiple partners would be like practicing my Oscar speech because I got on the 7-11 store cam. Since I don't have one steady partner, wondering about two seems a little premature.

But it's an interesting thought -- especially now, when traditional marriage seems to be going through a bit of an identity crisis. You have gay couples wanting to get married, and you know they're going to do it better than straight people (please see couture, design, dinner parties, manners and every other civilizing element of society).

Then there's the divorce rate -- which, according to Erika Lawrence, director of the UI Center for Marital and Family Studies, "has remained stable at 40 percent over the last 10 to 15 years" for first marriages, while it "hovers around 66 percent" for second and third timers. If cars didn't work 40 percent to 66 percent of the time, people would start hang-gliding to work.

So it seem less surprising that people might be looking for a new way to couple (or triple or quadruple). I don't know if America is ready for polyamory, but as Janet points out, people used to smoke everywhere, and now nobody does. There's lag time for things to change, but change they do.

And she seems pretty happy. "I did something right in my life to come to this place," she says. "My life has been magical."

Liz Langley is a freelance writer in Orlando, Fla.

 

Comments Give Us Feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Do your homework...
Posted by: Louisa on Apr 14, 2006 1:08 AM    [Report this comment]
This article is misguided at best. I feel as if the writer hasn't talked to anyone actually in the lifestyle or she would never have confused ideas like serial monogamy (what most people do) or "cheating" with the idea of polyamory.

I am not into it myself, I just know enough about polyamory to know that honesty is rule number one and that it is no small thing. Frankly, if people were generally more honest with themselves and each other, other types of romantic relationships might do better and thereby avoid becoming a part of the divorce/breakup statistics.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» RE: Do your homework... Posted by: Samantha Vimes
Ugh
Posted by: Uncle Tupelo on Apr 14, 2006 4:46 AM    [Report this comment]
Pardon me if I don't find this at all appealing. I got married so I could get out of the dating scene and settle down with and build my life around and hopefully grow old with one beautiful woman I love very much. That to me (and I suspect most people) sounds a lot better than basically being single again and having an unending series of superficial relationships with semi-strangers who are interested in little more than sex.

No thanks.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» RE: Ugh Posted by: Orwells_nightmare
» Wooohooo! Posted by: chasaturn
poe
Posted by: janiepoe on Apr 14, 2006 6:09 AM    [Report this comment]
this is just another threat on womens rights! women you better wake up!
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» RE: poe Posted by: zedaker
» RE: poe Posted by: Charaud
» RE: poe Posted by: lauramurphy
Polyamorous "couples"
Posted by: nosylae on Apr 14, 2006 6:10 AM    [Report this comment]
One of my good friends that I've known for almost 15 years is in polyamorous relationships. She has been with one person, a man for over 10 years and she has been in another long term relationship with a women for more than two years. I know her boyfriend is polyamorous with only other women and does not date (or have sex with) my friend's girlfriends. Their lifestyle is not about having superficial sex with people they hardly know - it is about being open and honest with themselves and their multiple partners. Of all the people I know, they probably have the healthiest long term relationship.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

family?
Posted by: zedaker on Apr 14, 2006 6:22 AM    [Report this comment]
it seems to me that the issue all comes down to freedom to define your own family. sex is only a peripheral component of the underlying debate. why can one man and one woman "decide" to be a family but two men, or two women, or 1 man and 2 women, or 1 woman and 2 men cannot? it's a bit like saying a business partnership may only consist of two partners. no one would dream of imposing that limitation on private business decisions so why do we do it to infinitely more important family decisions.
todays marriage laws have little to do with traditional religious strictures and everything to do with legal structures about lines of descent and inheritance (the term "illegitimate child" is completely nonsensical, no child is ever illegitimate!). our legal system is more than sophisticated enough to deal with poly-amory/gamy now and i think we should acknowledge and accept a person's individual right to determine his/her own family.
this in no way affects any person's right to have a one on one love/marriage family. it does recognize that everyone has rights to define family for themselves.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» RE: family? Posted by: RobertVermeers
» RE: family? Posted by: constantreader
Can a man handle more than one woman?
Posted by: pushing50 on Apr 14, 2006 6:32 AM    [Report this comment]
I have read somewhere that traditional Islamic teaching counsels that a second wife should be committed to only if the husband is able to FULLY satisfy all the needs (financial, practical, intellectual, emotional and SEXUAL) of both women. This same piece of writing also pointed out that the last man to really be able to handle such a challenge was the prophet himself. If a religious tradition often chided for its treatment of women includes this caution, doesn't that give us a clue? Viagra and Taoist sexual practices are not enough to make up for the natural disparity between a healthy woman's drive and the capacity of most men.
Yes, one can have sexual feelings for more than one person, and men, especially, are prone to this distraction, but it is, by definitiion, impossible to give one's "all" to more than one person. Someone is going to be shortchanged. Now, if we re-define marriage or relationship as sort of a neutral, arm's length arrangement wherein it doesn't matter whether important thoughts or events are shared, wherein, as the leprechaun in Finian's Rainbow suggests, we "fondle the hand at hand" or something along those lines, then we can manage multiples. But it is a major strain. I commend to everyone a review in the New Yorker of recent re-examinations of Jean Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, suggesting in the light of more currently available documents that the flavor of "polyamory" they practised was rather a perverse way of hurting others and then laughing about it together in private. I myself have been on both sides of a divided love, and it is equally painful to be the one splitting one's love between two people, as to be the one who is having to make do with half of someone's heart.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

another tragic example of the individual laziness
Posted by: bumpy on Apr 14, 2006 6:34 AM    [Report this comment]
monogamous relationships are not intended to be easy. it is hard work being committed to and loving one person. life and love is not about how easily one can get off, how convenient it would be to have a "safe person" in the kitchen and a "hot person" in the bed. PEOPLE WAKE UP!!! this is the issue that is behind all the screwed up ways our world works today. don't do what might be difficult or uncomfortable, but that would help you grow into a stronger, more beautiful and loving person, but look for the simple, quick way to get your "needs" met. It's sickening, ridiculous, and another reason I do n't feel that I belong in the world with all these crazy, lazy scum.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

Polyamory vs. extramarital affairs
Posted by: medstudgeek on Apr 14, 2006 7:26 AM    [Report this comment]
Polyamory is the simultaneous maintenance of more than one romantic relationship, where all partners know this is the case.

An extramarital affair usually involves hiding the truth from the spouse; you could argue if the spouse knew and accepted the situation it would become polyamory. I understand this is most commonly done in some gay male couples which will bring in a third man for the pleasure of both partners.

Quite frankly given the current political climate I don't think this is a crusade to bring up right now. Even gay marriage is costing us elections. Maybe in San Francisco.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» slavery vs. freedom Posted by: cthullhu
» RE: slavery vs. freedom Posted by: owleyes
» RE: slavery vs. freedom Posted by: cthullhu
» RE: slavery vs. freedom Posted by: owleyes
Hmmmmm.......
Posted by: Lizmv on Apr 14, 2006 7:31 AM    [Report this comment]
A subject many are uncomfortable with!
I have been in 2 long term relationships at the same time for the past 4 years. One man is 20 years younger than me ( 7 years) and the other is 10 years older 4 years). They each know about the other. we do not live together. The young man is single and sometimes dates other women nearer his age ( he'd like to marry and have kids someday, something I am past) and the older is married.
I think all 3 of us are deficient in a normal amount of jealousy. I have no desire to live with a man right now. That may change someday, should I meet the right one but who knows.
I never planned it this way. It's just how life worked out for us. There are those who judge us pretty harshly though, for not fitting ourselves into rigid cultural norms.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» you are not in love Posted by: owleyes
» RE: you are not in love Posted by: cthullhu
» RE: you are not in love Posted by: owleyes
Yay polyamory!
Posted by: oneMan on Apr 14, 2006 7:50 AM    [Report this comment]
I'm glad to see polyamory actually getting somewhat widespread attention. There's nothing wrong with monogamy it just shouldn't be viewed as the only feasible option. For people interested I highly reccomend Robert Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land". Although it is fiction, Heinlein does a good job of exploring what polyamory done right could be. For people interested in honesty polyamory is definitely something to look into. However, if you're the jealous type or a one woman/man type of person monogomy is still a tried and tested method. Yay options!
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» RE: Yay polyamory! Posted by: Moosehead
» RE: Yay polyamory! Posted by: cthullhu
» RE: Yay polyamory! Posted by: dbarber
I'll take the secret affair, thanks
Posted by: owleyes on Apr 14, 2006 8:26 AM    [Report this comment]
I think affairs on the DL are a better option, frankly, because at least with those there is a recognition of the dangerous business you're really getting into, and if you are a decent person and do it right, your spouse does not have to find out and you can avoid inflicting a horrible wound on him or her. Extramarital affairs and polyamory both boil down to using other people for one's own pleasure. Polyamory only tries to make infidelity okay by denying that the pain it causes is legitimate. Polyamory says, hey, if you're in a polyamorous relationship and you don't just love having intimate contact with all the penises and vaginas you can handle, then there you must have some wierd puritanical hangups that you would do well to get over. Who wants their entire existence sexualized by identifying with a group whose sole unifying factor is wanting to have unrestrained sex with a multiplicity of people? Besides, I love my husband, so I don't need anybody else.
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» decent? Posted by: cthullhu
» decent relative Posted by: cthullhu
wow.. I am amazed AND appalled
Posted by: lauramurphy on Apr 14, 2006 9:05 AM    [Report this comment]
by the comments, not the article... The author freely offers her shortcomings on understanding and experience, but many of the commenters feel free to judge something they do not understand.

Polyamory is about the heart not the body....

Hearts need honesty and trust and respect. There is nothing respectful about enabling a person's insecurities or robbing them of their ability to make informed choices. Cheating does both.

And loving more than one person does not mean that one doesn't love their husband, their wife, GF, BF, etc. It mean that you love them both. My husband and I have been practicing polyamorists for over 6 years now and contradictory to public perception we love each other MORE for it, not less. It takes a greater commitment to each other to live this path, not less. It is more work and we know each other and ourselves better, not less. Remember all those bad dates, those times when a relationship didn't work out, or you had your heart broken? Imagine it is your spouse who hold your hand and tells you that you are loved and that it will all be okay. I think of my marriage as my home-but it is not a place to hide from my heart or my insecurities. My husband deserves so much better than that and so do I.

Even more amazing.. Imagine falling in love with a person, having them return the sentiment, and the first person you want to share that with is your husband-because you know that he will celebrate it with you! I have that kind of love in my life and more.

Cheating is a cowardly way to conduct one's affairs, pun intended. Cheaters never have to confront how selfish they are, how insecure they are, how manipulative, controlling they are. I equate cheating with thievery because it robs everyone involved of an honest experience. The highest form of love cannot thrive in those circumstances-no matter how you justify it. I've lived both sides of that equation and it robbed me and the people involved of our love our self-respect.

I find it incredulous-and more than a little sad-that we so easily accept the limitations placed on our hearts and minds where love is concerned. Love is, by definition (by my understanding that is) expansive. Why would one try and limit that unless one has a misundertanding/misconception about the nature of love?

All that said, I want to add that polyamory isn't for everyone anymore than anything else is. It's simply another expression of the heart, another style of relating.

And, because people ask me this all the time... I do not have any more sex in my life than I did before we opened our hearts to others. Your mileage may vary of course ;)
 

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]

» amazed AND impressed Posted by: cthullhu
» amazed AND appalled Posted by: cthullhu
» RE: wow.. I am amazed AND appalled Posted by: constantreader
» oops... Posted by: lauramurphy
<