|
A
polyamory researcher tells what she's learned
fromThe Seattle Met
Despite the attention that polyamory is getting these days,
there's little solid, real-world sociological research into
it yet.
One of the few researchers working in this area is
Elisabeth Sheff
at Georgia State University. Here's her
synopsis
(as of 2007) of her research since 1996 on polyamorists and
other sexual minorities (see left side of document).
Currently Sheff is conducting, among other things, a
long-term study of poly families with children, tracking how
both the families and the kids develop over time.
Sociologists work under strict ethics rules regarding their
subjects, children especially. Only recently did she gain
clearance to interview children as young as six. She is
looking for additional polyfamiles with kids to include in
this long-term study; if interested, contact her at the
address in the links above.
Meanwhile, Sheff offers some frank observations about the
poly world in an interview in the Seattle Met, a
glossy city magazine (June 2010 issue). She paints an
unvarnished picture, but everything here strikes me as true.
Excerpts:
Dr. Elisabeth Sheff, assistant professor in the Sociology
Department at Georgia State University, has studied
polyamorous couples and families since 1997. The following
is taken from an interview with Seattle Met ’s
Kathryn Robinson.
How do you define polyamory?
Polyamory is a form of relationship in which people openly
maintain multiple romantic, sexual, and/or affective
partners. With its emphasis on long-term, emotionally
intimate relationships, polyamory differs from swinging—and
from adultery—in its focus on honesty and full disclosure of
the network of relationships to all who participate in or
are affected by them.
What form has your study of polyamory taken?
I initially wrote my dissertation at University of Colorado
at Boulder on polyamory, looking primarily at the Midwest
and West. It was not designed to be longitudinal, but I have
conducted follow-up studies since then to track as many of
the initial respondents as I can.
What have you learned?
That polyamory works great for some people and is disastrous
for others. Some find it an extremely fulfilling, liberating
lifestyle based on really authentic, deep, emotionally
intimate interactions, and are willing to put a lot of
effort into that, because it is extremely time-consuming.
It’s a lot of work. For others, it produces a lot
of insecurity, jealousy, fighting. Some relationships break
up. I would say overall, it doesn’t often turn out to be the
idyllic, utopian love fest that many people want it to be.
It takes a lot of effort to make it work well. It’s not just
constant sex all the time; it requires a lot of
communication. In fact, sometimes there’s alarmingly little
sex.
So it looks like real life?
Yes! A lot!
What are the reasons people give for pursuing it?
The idea of emotional plentitude; that you don’t run out of
love by just loving one person. That there’s lots of love to
go around. With that comes a rejection of ownership. The
idea that one can lay claim to someone else and what they
can do with their body and their emotions is repugnant to
these folks. So often there’s kind of a libertarian streak,
a kind of ‘We’re gonna do what we want, so leave us alone!’
Some are consciously rebellious, so their polyamory is a
kind of label of non-conformity to the regular, vanilla
crowd. It often goes with ideas of multiplicity on other
levels, so many enjoy paganism.
But many practitioners are just regular people, who feel
they either have plenty of love to go around, or needs they
don’t want to put all on one person. It’s a way to have more
attention or different kinds of attention, or more
companionship. It’s the idea that it’s too much to ask one
person to be everything, so you either have to deny your
needs or find a different way to get them met. Finally, [polyamory]
offers a model that allows women complete access to
multiplicity rather than the traditional [polygamous] model
of just men having access to multiplicity.
Who does it not work for?
The ones I’ve seen as doomed are the couples who come in
with a very staunch idea of what they’re looking for. Like
the female-male couple, maybe married or maybe just
partnered, looking for a bisexual woman to add to their
relationship. They’re looking to create a triad of one man
with two women. Often they have set ideas about who she’ll
be and act, come looking for her, and frankly they have a
hard time finding her.
So it’s a couple that wants a wife!
Yes. And it’s hard to find. Not that many women want to do
that. It often leaves the bisexual woman feeling like ‘Hey!
I’m not your sex toy!’ And it often leaves the couples
dissatisfied. This search is so common within poly
communities, this bisexual woman is called ‘The Unicorn.’
Because most of the women in the poly scene are partnered on
some level.
But what about the heterosexual couple where the guy just
wants freedom for both of them to pursue other love
relationships outside the primary relationship?
Y
es, there are folks like that. Pretty regularly it is the
dude who says, ‘Let’s check this out.’ The women is often
more hesitant at first, sometimes will enter the poly
community, if not kicking and screaming, at least lagging
behind. Then she’ll realize, ‘Wow this is great! It’s not as
scary as I thought.’ And he’ll realize, ‘Wait this isn’t as
much fun as I expected. It’s not living up to my fantasy.
There’s not as much sex. Not as many partners as I thought.’
Is that common?
Enough that it’s cliché that they each do a 180.
I think that some men think they’ll be the sexual center
of attention, but then they end up just having two women
they have to be communicative with. In fact in some of the
couples who do end up finding The Unicorn, and having sex
with her, the man will say, ‘How disappointing!’ because the
women were so focused on each other, he’s like, ‘Hello, I’m
over here!’
What else changes when couples become polyamorous?
Introducing other people into the relationship almost always
changes relationship dynamics. Add something else in and
everything shifts. Sometimes it’s large, sometimes minor.
But sometimes it shifts in directions that change power
relationships or the status quo, that takes her attention
away from him, or that makes the woman question other
aspects of their power dynamic. Once women loose the
constraints of monogamy, it can trigger a whole set of other
things the woman might question, like ‘Why am I always the
one that takes off work to take the kids to the doctor?’
How often does polyamory work?
Depends on what you mean by work. If you mean, takes some
form and stays that way ‘til death do us part—extremely
infrequently. But if you mean, meets the needs of the people
involved for that point in time, then quite a bit. The
larger the polyamorous groups get the less stable and
cohesive they are. The more enduring form tends to be the
open couple: The male-female couple who cohabitate, with
additional partners. It’s the most common and appears to be
the most enduring. But their cast of characters tends to
shift.
And do couples of that description stay together?
Their chances of staying together depends wholly on who they
are.
You mean like ones with great self-esteem can best
overcome the jealousy?
Well…in reality who doesn’t have self-esteem issues?
Predicating successful poly on perfect self-esteem isn’t
going to work. But some people have a degree of relational
possessiveness that makes poly a bad choice for them. Some
people are just hardwired to be monogamous. I do think that.
As a sociologist, that’s uncomfortable to say…it’s so
essentialist! But it’s just their most comfortable emotional
zone, a personality orientation, not unlike a sexual
orientation. And, I think, some are hardwired to be poly.
OK, so now it’s my turn to be essentialist. What’s the
difference between a polyamorous male and…a guy?
If he wants to have other partners but doesn’t want you to
have other partners, that’s a major red flag.
How did you become interested in polyamory?
I was the classic woman who came in kicking and screaming.
My partner really wanted to try it, and was looking for The
Unicorn but couldn’t find her. He found other things. And I
found another man. Basically he couldn’t deal with that. So
ten years into it for the two of us, and at great trauma to
us both, we came back to monogamy. We tried that for the
next five years—and it wasn’t problematic sexually, because
in reality neither of us really been that actively
polyamorous. But I felt so betrayed by his sudden turn of
intention once I found another man—I couldn’t get over that.
Because he had pushed it for so long, finally overcoming my
resistance, and then once I began to like it he said, ‘No,
let’s not do this.’ I was like, ‘No! You don’t get to make
that rule!’ Finally I left him. We’ve remained good friends,
but I’m really gun-shy of polyamory for myself. I’m not sure
I could maintain a long-term poly relationship. I could date
multiple people, yes. But the idealized poly image of having
this expanded family—it is just so much work.
Is Seattle a hotbed of polyamory—so to speak?
Yes! Seattle and the Bay Area are both centers of polyamory.
Washington, D.C., as well. Much like gay and lesbian
communities, polys gravitate towards larger population
centers because of the social opportunities. The West Coast
has always had this sexual adventurousness, and is a bastion
of sexual tolerance. Plus there’s a strong connection
between poly and bisexuality, and Seattle has been a major
center of bisexual organizing.
World
Polyamory Association
1371 Malaihi Road
Wailuku, Maui, HI 96793
808-244-4103
info@worldpolyamoryassociation.com,
WorldPolyamory@aol.com Copyright ©
2004 [World Polyamory Association]. All rights reserved.
Revised: July 22, 2011
|